After learning the text, what do you think of the way the author reports on this disaster? Is it somewhat unusual? Do you like this article? Why or why not?
This article breaks through the cold documentary of traditional disaster reports, and uses the dedication of one person to connect the cruelty of the disaster with the glory of humanity. I like this article. The brave and selfless image of the "man in the water" has left a deep impression on readers and triggered their continuous thinking about courage and dedication.
The author's reporting style highlights the brilliance of human nature and contrasts and symbolizes the heroic glow of the people in the water, presenting a unique perspective. The author also uses "the people in the water" to shape ordinary yet great heroes. I like this article because it can evoke strong emotional resonance, depicting the choices between life and death in the face of disaster to write about human nature, and the words are very touching.
He reported this article in a narrative style, which was somewhat unusual. I like this article because it tells the story of the tremendous power that human nature demonstrates when facing disasters, and it praises heroism.
I think the author's way of reporting disasters is very different from traditional news and is very appealing to readers. This article is not merely confined to the facts themselves. Instead, it focuses on human nature and highlights the selfless acts of the people in the water. At the same time, it elevates the tragedy into a contemplation of human nature. The anonymity of the people in the water is regarded by the author as a symbol of heroism, which tells us that extraordinary courage can also come from every ordinary person. I like this article because it is not just a simple news report. It talks about human nature starting from the event, triggering readers' thinking about the goodness of human nature and the confrontation between human individuals and nature, and it has far-reaching significance for society.
Whether the author’s reporting on the disaster is unusual depends on the style. It could be seen as different if it uses personal narratives instead of just facts, has a non - linear structure, or relies on metaphorical language.I might like the article if it balances emotions and facts well, using stories to make the disaster relatable. But if it’s too abstract or lacks important details, I probably wouldn’t.
If the author emphasizes personal stories over stats or uses a non - linear narrative to report the disaster, it’s unusual. For example, telling individual victims’ experiences instead of just listing numbers makes it vivid.I might like it if these techniques engage me and evoke empathy, like showing different people’s disaster stories. But I won’t if the style is too confusing or hides key facts about the disaster’s cause and scale.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
Regarding "the man in the water," this anonymous man is indeed an unsung hero. In today's society, we are no strangers to unsung heroes. We can observe that some individuals possess a broad-minded spirit and lofty pursuits, willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of others, thus making their deaths more meaningful. This serves as an inspiration to ordinary people like us.
Heroes don't necessarily have to be those of high status; they can be ordinary people around us. Ordinary individuals also embody great love and heroism. What we lack nowadays is precisely this selfless spirit, and the example of such heroes encourages us to cultivate a similarly magnanimous mindset.
When the plane crashed, he repeatedly gave his life jacket and lifeline to others. Such behavior, I think, is beyond what most people can do, which exactly reflects this person's unique qualities. I really like this article because it's highly educational and inspiring.
I think the author's reporting style is evry novel.Unlike other news reports focusing on practically and the events,he pays more attention to the rising reader's emotional reaonance.
The author's way of reporting the disaster is very novel and unique. Not only is there a simple narrative, he used "the man in the water" to express this life-saving hero more vivid image. So it's very unusual. I also like this article very much. Because it tells us that although nature is usually above human beings, in the fight of natural disasters, people sometimes pay their own lives to reach the commanding height of morality and hold people and nature to a standoff.
The author's unique narrative technique and deep thematic excavation make this article stand out from the rest of disaster reporting. Yes, it is. I like this article, through the story of the "man in the water", the article explores the profound themes of human nature, heroism, life and death decisions, etc., which makes people move and provoke deep thought, and the image of the "man in the water" has a strong symbolic meaning, he represents those heroes who stand up in times of crisis and selflessly dedicate, this image is deeply imprinted in the reader's mind.
The author's way of reporting the disaster is very novel and unique. Not only is there a simple narrative, he used "the man in the water" to express this life-saving hero more vivid image. So it's very unusual. I also like this article very much. Because it tells us that although nature is usually above human beings, in the fight of natural disasters, people sometimes pay their own lives to reach the commanding height of morality and hold people and nature to a standoff.
I think the author's reporting style is very novel and unconventional. Ordinary news usually focuses on timeliness and accuracy, but this article pays more attention to characters and feature stories. So I like such kind of articles rather than ordinary news. Because they are more attractive and have deeper meanings.
The author of this article combines objective narration with detailed description, and the author presents the general situation of the disaster in the form of objective narration, and at the same time uses detailed description to enhance the appeal and realism of the article.
I like this article, first of all, the author's language style is vivid and interesting, full of appeal, which attracts the reader's interest in reading, secondly, this article provokes us to think about how to better prevent disasters and how human society should be more united in the face of disasters, and finally, this article can truly show people's emotions and resonate with readers.
The author's unique narrative technique and deep thematic excavation make this article stand out from the rest of disaster reporting. Yes, it is. I like this article, through the story of the "man in the water", the article explores the profound themes of human nature, heroism, life and death decisions, etc., which makes people move and provoke deep thought, and the image of the "man in the water" has a strong symbolic meaning, he represents those heroes who stand up in times of crisis and selflessly dedicate, this image is deeply imprinted in the reader's mind.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
I like this article, first of all, the author's language style is vivid and interesting, full of appeal, which attracts the reader's interest in reading, secondly, this article provokes us to think about how to better prevent disasters and how human society should be more united in the face of disasters, and finally, this article can truly show people's emotions and resonate with readers.
The author’s reporting is unusual because it shifts focus from the disaster itself to its deeper meaning—human courage versus indifferent nature. Instead of sensationalizing tragedy, Rosenblatt highlights the anonymous hero’s selflessness, turning him into a universal symbol of humanity’s moral strength.
I like this article because it transcends typical disaster coverage. It’s not just about facts but about existential themes: sacrifice, anonymity, and the paradox of human powerlessness yet moral victory. The poetic contrast between nature’s cruelty and the man’s kindness lingers, making it unforgettable.
I think the author reports on this disaster is unique. It is unusual because his writing combines literary quality and philosophical depth.I like this article.Because it expresses the infinite potential of human beings and the good nature of humanity, proving that everyone is not ordinary.
The author's unique narrative technique and deep thematic excavation make this article stand out from the rest of disaster reporting. Yes, it is. I like this article, through the story of the "man in the water", the article explores the profound themes of human nature, heroism, life and death decisions, etc., which makes people move and provoke deep thought, and the image of the "man in the water" has a strong symbolic meaning, he represents those heroes who stand up in times of crisis and selflessly dedicate, this image is deeply imprinted in the reader's mind.
I think the report written by the author is different from what we often see in our daily life. It doesn't merely describe the process of the disaster event. Instead, it incorporates various viewpoints and thoughts into the article, and it is indeed quite unusual. I like this article because it is not monotonous. On the contrary, it can greatly inspire my thinking, making me reflect on the beautiful qualities of human beings and filling me, as a human being, with a sense of hope
The author's unique narrative technique and deep thematic excavation make this article stand out from the rest of disaster reporting. Yes, it is. I like this article, through the story of the "man in the water", the article explores the profound themes of human nature, heroism, life and death decisions, etc., which makes people move and provoke deep thought, and the image of the "man in the water" has a strong symbolic meaning, he represents those heroes who stand up in times of crisis and selflessly dedicate, this image is deeply imprinted in the reader's mind.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
The author's way of reporting this kind of disaster is rather unusual. Instead of focusing on the details of the plane crash itself, the author emphasizes the heroic deeds of several individuals, demonstrating the selflessness and greatness of these heroes. I like this article. Firstly, it offers a unique perspective on disaster reporting. Secondly, the descriptions in this article are vivid. Finally, this article touches my heart and makes people feel awed by these selfless heroes.
1.The narrative style is very unique. Instead of focusing on the technical details of the air crash or the horror of the disaster itself, it focuses on the glorious moments of humanity. This article is not just a report on a disaster; it is a profound reflection on humanity, morality, and the meaning of life.
2.This narrative style is unusual in disaster reporting. Usually, disaster reports focus on describing the process of the event, the casualties, and the rescue operations, but the author chooses to explore the issue of humanity's struggle against nature through the behavior of an ordinary person.
3.This article is highly worthy of appreciation . Through the actions of that unnamed hero, the article showcases the selflessness, bravery, and spirit of sacrifice in humanity. This positive portrayal of humanity makes people feel warm and hopeful.
Adopt a unique and novel reporting approach.By focusing on the actions of an unidentified hero, this approach praises the selflessness and greatness of human beings. This approach is different from the more traditional disaster coverage, which often focuses on the scale of the disaster or the actions of the official rescue teams.Yes,I like it .Because he told us that ordinary people also have extraordinary influence.