This article breaks through the cold documentary of traditional disaster reports, and uses the dedication of one person to connect the cruelty of the disaster with the glory of humanity. I like this article. The brave and selfless image of the "man in the water" has left a deep impression on readers and triggered their continuous thinking about courage and dedication.
教学团队
课程特色
视频(50)
练习(41)
作业(8)
考试(1)
最新学员
Unit 4 Discussion
After learning the text, what do you think of the way the author reports on this disaster? Is it somewhat unusual? Do you like this article? Why or why not?
108 回复
-
-
The author's reporting style highlights the brilliance of human nature and contrasts and symbolizes the heroic glow of the people in the water, presenting a unique perspective. The author also uses "the people in the water" to shape ordinary yet great heroes. I like this article because it can evoke strong emotional resonance, depicting the choices between life and death in the face of disaster to write about human nature, and the words are very touching.
-
He reported this article in a narrative style, which was somewhat unusual. I like this article because it tells the story of the tremendous power that human nature demonstrates when facing disasters, and it praises heroism.
-
I think the author's way of reporting disasters is very different from traditional news and is very appealing to readers. This article is not merely confined to the facts themselves. Instead, it focuses on human nature and highlights the selfless acts of the people in the water. At the same time, it elevates the tragedy into a contemplation of human nature. The anonymity of the people in the water is regarded by the author as a symbol of heroism, which tells us that extraordinary courage can also come from every ordinary person. I like this article because it is not just a simple news report. It talks about human nature starting from the event, triggering readers' thinking about the goodness of human nature and the confrontation between human individuals and nature, and it has far-reaching significance for society.
-
Whether the author’s reporting on the disaster is unusual depends on the style. It could be seen as different if it uses personal narratives instead of just facts, has a non - linear structure, or relies on metaphorical language.I might like the article if it balances emotions and facts well, using stories to make the disaster relatable. But if it’s too abstract or lacks important details, I probably wouldn’t.
-
If the author emphasizes personal stories over stats or uses a non - linear narrative to report the disaster, it’s unusual. For example, telling individual victims’ experiences instead of just listing numbers makes it vivid.I might like it if these techniques engage me and evoke empathy, like showing different people’s disaster stories. But I won’t if the style is too confusing or hides key facts about the disaster’s cause and scale.
-
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
添加回复
您确定给 “0” 位老师发送协议吗？
UMOOCS用户服务协议
问题分类：
--
4008987008