After learning the text, what do you think of the way the author reports on this disaster? Is it somewhat unusual? Do you like this article? Why or why not?
It was reported in the form of an essay and employed many rhetorical devices. Yes, it is somewhat unusual and different from the common serious and regular reporting forms.
I like it.
First of all, this article is very vivid. The scene description at the beginning is captivating, vividly depicting the scene when the accident occurred, which can catch the readers' eyes.
Secondly, this article is highly philosophical. The author discusses the confrontation between human nature and nature with extremely strong logic, which has great enlightening significance.
This report is unusual. I perfer the way to regard this as an article, a novel. Because it reveals the inner thinking and neurotic feeling of the main character. It carries many styles where you can see in novels. I like this article, it does not focus on the cold data of casualty, but stresses on the emotional power of the man in the water, demonstrating the spirit of humanity.
The author describes this disaster from a unique perspective, taking into account both the perspective of the rescuers and that of the rescued, making it easier for readers to understand the emotions involved. I like this article because it vividly presents the disaster scene, giving people a strong sense of immersion, and it also enables people to have a more detailed understanding of the heroes.
I like this article."The Man in the Water" is a remarkable article that offers a unique perspective on a disaster, such as focusing on Individuals, Interweaving of Reflection and Narrative.Its reporting method is both unusual and effective. It has the power to inspire readers, challenging them to think about the human experience in the face of tragedy.
It's really excellent. It adopts the third-person perspective narrative method and leads readers to have an in-depth understanding of this disaster in a fair and objective way. Yes, I like this article very much. It makes me understand that heroes are around us. They have a deep reverence for life but also dare to fight against difficulties in life. Everyone's life is precious, but it's always heroes who are willing to sacrifice themselves.
I think the author's way of reporting disasters is very different from traditional news and is very appealing to readers. This article is not merely confined to the facts themselves. Instead, it focuses on human nature and highlights the selfless acts of the people in the water. At the same time, it elevates the tragedy into a contemplation of human nature. The anonymity of the people in the water is regarded by the author as a symbol of heroism, which tells us that extraordinary courage can also come from every ordinary person. I like this article because it is not just a simple news report. It talks about human nature starting from the event, triggering readers' thinking about the goodness of human nature and the confrontation between human individuals and nature, and it has far-reaching significance for society.
I agree with your view. The author indeed adopts an unconventional approach. Instead of simply listing facts, they focus on individual stories like the “man in the water”. This not only makes the disaster more relatable but also delves deep into complex human emotions and moral dilemmas. It makes me reflect on the power of self - sacrifice and the complexity of human nature in extreme situations. Such in - depth exploration is what makes this article truly remarkable.
I like this form of reporting. The detailed description of the incident site and the thorough account of the accident give readers a sense of being there and help them understand the accident very well.
The author of this article combines objective narration with detailed description, and the author presents the general situation of the disaster in the form of objective narration, and at the same time uses detailed description to enhance the appeal and realism of the article.
I like this article, first of all, the author's language style is vivid and interesting, full of appeal, which attracts the reader's interest in reading, secondly, this article provokes us to think about how to better prevent disasters and how human society should be more united in the face of disasters, and finally, this article can truly show people's emotions and resonate with readers.
The way the author reports on this disaster is very unique. Unlike other reports on disaster,which mainly describes the chaotic and circumstances, however, the author focuses on "the man in the wat er" to deeply analyze the disaster. Yes ,I like this article. It reflects selflessness of great humanity. And it also creates a remarkable character for many people to respect and imitate.
I think the author's reporting style is unusual and novel. Most of the news that we often learn is about paying attention to the things and results rather than a person. I like this article. Because I think the news report should not only focus on the events themselves, but also pay attention to the people involved to make more and more people feel the warmth in our society.
I think the author's approach to reporting this air disaster is quite unique. His writing doesn't solely focus on the tragedy's devastation, but rather highlights the greatness of humanity.In the face of disaster, humans appear so small, yet so great.I like this article.This article takes us to appreciate the spiritual strength of the man in the water—nature may be indifferent and merciless, yet humans can still resist with their own power.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
I think this report is somewhat like a narrative. The author's way of reporting on this disaster is very special, breaking my general impression of reports. I like it very much. The author did not report this disaster in a rigid pattern of time, place, characters, cause, process, and result. Firstly, the author vividly describes the scene of the disaster to the readers through rhetorical devices such as metaphor and personification, making them feel as if they were right there. Secondly, the author also imagines a harmonious and peaceful scene on the plane before the disaster, which is extremely touching and further highlights the hero's bravery and selflessness. Moreover, the author's portrayal of the hero's image is very ingenious. He emphasizes the "ordinariness" of the hero, breaking the sense of distance between ordinary people and the hero, and calls on people to learn this spirit of dedication in a brand-new way. This makes me admire it very much.
I think the author's way of reporting the disaster is really different. Generally, disaster reports may focus on how severe the disaster was, the number of casualties, and the difficulties of the rescue process. But Roger Rosenblatt focused on the "man in the water" who kept giving his lifebuoy to others. Through the portrayal of this ordinary person, the article makes me feel the brilliance of human nature. When reading it, it was as if I had witnessed the man giving up his chance to save himself again and again, leaving the hope of survival to others. I really like this article. Because it uses the story of an ordinary yet great person to make me believe that in the face of disaster, there are always people who can shine with the light of human nature, and this kind of power is very touching to me.
The way the author reports on this disaster is very unique. I think the way the author reports this disaster is great, it isn’t unusual, I like this article because the article depicts the heroes of the disaster very well, making people unable to help but admire these heroes and feel regret and sadness for their passing.
The reporting style is novel and unique. It does not clearly indicate who the heroic rescuer is, but endows "it" with the function of representing this kind of person. I like this article because it promotes energy and emphasizes that ordinary people can also become heroes.
The author's unique narrative technique and deep thematic excavation make this article stand out from the rest of disaster reporting. Yes, it is. I like this article, through the story of the "man in the water", the article explores the profound themes of human nature, heroism, life and death decisions, etc., which makes people move and provoke deep thought, and the image of the "man in the water" has a strong symbolic meaning, he represents those heroes who stand up in times of crisis and selflessly dedicate, this image is deeply imprinted in the reader's mind.
The author describes this disaster from a unique perspective, taking into account both the perspective of the rescuers and that of the rescued, making it easier for readers to understand the emotions involved. I like this article because it vividly presents the disaster scene, giving people a strong sense of immersion, and it also enables people to have a more detailed understanding of the heroes.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
I think the report written by the author is different from what we often see in our daily life. It doesn't merely describe the process of the disaster event. Instead, it incorporates various viewpoints and thoughts into the article, and it is indeed quite unusual. I like this article because it is not monotonous. On the contrary, it can greatly inspire my thinking, making me reflect on the beautiful qualities of human beings and filling me, as a human being, with a sense of hope.
I think the author's way of reporting on this disaster is rather unusual. Unlike many traditional disaster reports that focus solely on the numbers of casualties and property losses, this author weaves in personal stories and emotions. For example, by describing the experiences of individual survivors, it makes the disaster more relatable and vivid.
I do like this article. Its unique approach makes me not only understand the physical impact of the disaster but also feel the human cost behind it. It makes me empathize more with the victims. The in - depth exploration of human nature and emotions during the disaster - stricken period is what makes this article stand out and touch my heart.
I think the author's reporting style is novel.I like this article.Because it gives people a strong sense of immersion and takes us to appreciate the spiritual strength of the man in the water.
I think the author's way of reporting disasters is very different from traditional news and is very appealing to readers. This article is not merely confined to the facts themselves. Instead, it focuses on human nature and highlights the selfless acts of the people in the water. At the same time, it elevates the tragedy into a contemplation of human nature. The anonymity of the people in the water is regarded by the author as a symbol of heroism, which tells us that extraordinary courage can also come from every ordinary person. I like this article because it is not just a simple news report. It talks about human nature starting from the event, triggering readers' thinking about the goodness of human nature and the confrontation between human individuals and nature, and it has far-reaching significance for society.
I like the article and the way this author described it. The author saw the selfless dedication of people from an accident, and from this extended to the reflection on the struggle between nature and man, which inspires people to understand that even if the power of man is small, the contagion of the spirit of selfless dedication is infinite.
I like this article because it catches my attention,it has a huge difference between others articles.The author write this article in a objective and factual way,but this article prompts people to think.On one hand,this article praises the selflessness and bravery of the man in the water，on the other hand,it describes the conflict between nature and human character which makes this article more vivid.It is a catastrophe that no one wants to recall. However, the story, along with its symbolic meanings, reminds me of the greatness within human beings.
After reading The Man in the Water, I find the author's reporting style quite unique. Unlike typical disaster reports that focus on statistics or grand narratives, the article zeroes in on an anonymous man in the water, using his individual actions to highlight human dignity amid chaos. This approach makes the disaster more relatable and emotionally impactful, as the man's selflessness becomes a symbol of hope.
I like this article. First, the title is very appealing, sparking my imagination about "the man in the water". Whether depicting the tense atmosphere or laying foreshadowing of tragic disaster scenes, I think the author handled it exceptionally well. The most fascinating part is the core theme the article presents: ordinary people, whose names you may never know, always demonstrate extraordinary strength in their standoff against nature. This significance has transcended the very triviality of life itself.
Employ a distinctive and innovative reporting method. By centering on the deeds of an unknown hero, this way of reporting celebrates human selflessness and greatness. It differs from more traditional disaster coverage, which usually fixates on the disaster’s scale or official rescue teams’ actions. I like it because it shows that ordinary people can have extraordinary influence.
您确定给 “
4008987008