After learning the text, what do you think of the way the author reports on this disaster? Is it somewhat unusual? Do you like this article? Why or why not?
The author's unique narrative technique and deep thematic excavation make this article stand out from the rest of disaster reporting. Yes, it is. I like this article, through the story of the "man in the water", the article explores the profound themes of human nature, heroism, life and death decisions, etc., which makes people move and provoke deep thought, and the image of the "man in the water" has a strong symbolic meaning, he represents those heroes who stand up in times of crisis and selflessly dedicate, this image is deeply imprinted in the reader's mind.
I think the author's reporting style is very novel and unconventional. Ordinary news usually focuses on timeliness and accuracy, but this article pays more attention to characters and feature stories. So I like such kind of articles rather than ordinary news. Because they are more attractive and have deeper meanings.
The author's way of reporting this article is unique, not only in the third person narrative, but also by introducing the words of the parties involved, making it more persuasive. I like this article because the significance of the man in the water is extraordinary. He represents the power of humanity in the natural world, and the confrontation between humans and nature has existed since ancient times. I believe that his power is greater than that of nature because he endows human power with meaning, including the power of love, creativity, transformation, and so on.
Adopt a unique and novel reporting approach.By focusing on the actions of an unidentified hero, this approach praises the selflessness and greatness of human beings. This approach is different from the more traditional disaster coverage, which often focuses on the scale of the disaster or the actions of the official rescue teams.Yes,I like it .Because he told us that ordinary people also have extraordinary influence.
I like this article. Unlike some reports, it isn't boring, plain, or impersonal. Instead, it is a report filled with awe, tears, and thought-provoking insights. This report not only describes a terrible air crash but also pays tribute to the heroes who bravely jumped into the chilly river to save survivors, risking their own lives. It gives us a profound reflection on human character. As the author wrote, "He was likewise giving a lifeline to those who watched him."
The author's way of reporting the disaster is very novel and unique. Not only is there a simple narrative, he used "the man in the water" to express this life-saving hero more vivid image. So it's very unusual. I also like this article very much. Because it tells us that although nature is usually above human beings, in the fight of natural disasters, people sometimes pay their own lives to reach the commanding height of morality and hold people and nature to a standoff.
I think the author's way of reporting disasters is very different from traditional news and is very appealing to readers. This article is not merely confined to the facts themselves. Instead, it focuses on human nature and highlights the selfless acts of the people in the water. At the same time, it elevates the tragedy into a contemplation of human nature. The anonymity of the people in the water is regarded by the author as a symbol of heroism, which tells us that extraordinary courage can also come from every ordinary person. I like this article because it is not just a simple news report. It talks about human nature starting from the event, triggering readers' thinking about the goodness of human nature and the confrontation between human individuals and nature, and it has far-reaching significance for society.
The author uses novel and detailed way to show the whole process of the disaster.And let our readers to konw the disaster more clear. There truely exists some unusual parts, for example, at the end of the article, the author uses two different meanings of 'lifeline',and it's thought-provoking.i like this article,it let me knows the greatness of humanity.
The author reports that this article is unique. In the article, we see that humans are extremely insignificant before nature. However, there are still some people who bravely step forward. The article shows us the bravery of human nature, as well as love and creativity.
Frankly speaking, I love this article more than other articles we learned before. Not only the author's narrative method: setting up suspense and using a lot of side descriptions, but also because of the spirit of self-sacrifice of those four people.
This article takes the hero in the air crash as the main object to be portrayed, with "the man in the water "as the main character, showing the infinite power of human beings. And I like this article." The man in the water "depicted by the author has touched me and triggered my contemplation on human lives and human strength.
1.The narrative style is very unique. Instead of focusing on the technical details of the air crash or the horror of the disaster itself, it focuses on the glorious moments of humanity. This article is not just a report on a disaster; it is a profound reflection on humanity, morality, and the meaning of life.
2.This narrative style is unusual in disaster reporting. Usually, disaster reports focus on describing the process of the event, the casualties, and the rescue operations, but the author chooses to explore the issue of humanity's struggle against nature through the behavior of an ordinary person.
3.This article is highly worthy of appreciation . Through the actions of that unnamed hero, the article showcases the selflessness, bravery, and spirit of sacrifice in humanity. This positive portrayal of humanity makes people feel warm and hopeful.
I think the author's way of reporting this disaster is innovative and touching.Yes, it is.Yes,I do.Because this article focuses on depicting the scene of the disaster, it has artistic embellishments, making people feel more as if they were there.The author also spends many pages describing how heroes sacrifice themselves, showing how this affects regular people.
I think the way the author reports on this disaster is attractive and unusual.Usually,the reports describe the sences and the basic situations of the events.However,the report describes the event vividly.It also uses the technique of comparison.It can better demonstrate the quality of heroes.I like the article,it told us everyone can be a hero.Though human is powerless,we held it to a standoff.
The author's way of reporting this kind of disaster is rather unusual. Instead of focusing on the details of the plane crash itself, the author emphasizes the heroic deeds of several individuals, demonstrating the selflessness and greatness of these heroes. I like this article. Firstly, it offers a unique perspective on disaster reporting. Secondly, the descriptions in this article are vivid. Finally, this article touches my heart and makes people feel awed by these selfless heroes.
I like this article because it catches my attention,it has a huge difference between others articles.The author write this article in a objective and factual way,but this article prompts people to think.On one hand,this article praises the selflessness and bravery of the man in the water,on the other hand,it describes the conflict between nature and human character which makes this article more vivid.
I think the way the author reported on the disaster is good. Unlike previous reporting methods, the author focuses on the personal experiences and emotions of victims, rescuers, and witnesses, resonating with readers. Also use vivid detail to describe the disaster scene. I like this article, it promotes the good character of heroes.
The author did not focus too much on the disaster itself, but rather placed emphasis on the humanistic brilliance that emerged during the disaster. Through the depiction of the "man in the water", the article showcases his selflessness and bravery in the disaster. This reporting style is refreshing. I like this article because it pays more attention to humanity and morality rather than merely dwelling on the surface of the disaster, allowing me to deeply understand the severity of the disaster and the greatness of humanity.
The author's reporting style is unique. He does not focus on describing the horror of the disaster, but on the self-sacrifice of the "man in the water". I like this article, which sublimates disasters into the nature of human resistance to indifference, praises the divinity of ordinary people, and calmly conveys shock to readers. This way of amplifying the description of heroism breaks the routine of disaster reporting.
This article by the author is not just a story about disaster and rescue, but also a impressive exploration of human nature, courage, and the spirit of self-sacrifice. The self-sacrifice of the man in the water is not a sudden impulse, but stems from deep-seated care and a sense of responsibility for others. I like this article because in our daily lives, we are always accustomed to associating the image of heroes with those who have extraordinary abilities and accomplish earth-shattering feats. But in fact, the real heroes may be hidden among the ordinary people around us. They may not have superpowers, nor do they have the opportunity to perform feats that shock the world. However, at critical moments, the kindness, courage, and sense of responsibility in their hearts will drive them to step forward and make admirable choices. Greatness is forged in the ordinary, and heroes are all around us.
I think the author reports on this disaster is unique. It is unusual because his writing combines literary quality and philosophical depth.I like this article.Because it expresses the infinite potential of human beings and the good nature of humanity, proving that everyone is not ordinary.
The author's reporting on the disaster is indeed unusual. Instead of simply presenting the facts in a traditional, objective manner, the author focuses on a specific individual, "the man in the water." This approach allows readers to personalize the disaster and feel a deeper connection to the event. I like this article because this text make me realize that every one can be a hero just like that man in the water.
I think the author's way of describing this air crash is unusual. I really like this method of description. Because he did not simply and uninteresting narrate an accident, but compared human power with natural power, highlighting the brilliance of human nature, emphasizing human agency, and having extraordinary significance.
I think the author's description of this disaster is very unique and appealing to the reader. First of all, he does not focus on the background of the hero, but believes that the anonymity of the hero is more indicative of his heroism. Secondly, this is not only a report on the accident, but also an article that can cause readers to reflect, it rises from the story of the accident to the reflection on human nature, telling us that true heroism can also come from ordinary people, and has a profound impact on our society.
I don't think the narrative of this news report is ordinary. It is different from ordinary news reports. It doesn't describe the entire disaster from beginning to end. It merely selects one scene from the disaster and focuses on reporting on one person. The part selected for the report is the most dramatic and wonderful part of the entire event.
From my perspective,it's unusual for the author to report this article.the author didn't put emphasis on the number of death while writing the several heroes'commitment.This way demonstrates the fight between nature and human beings.It also compares the impersonal and selflessness.It is the point that shows the admirable human characters.I love this article because I am impressed by the heroic deeds described in the text.
I think the report written by the author is different from what we often see in our daily life. It doesn't merely describe the process of the disaster event. Instead, it incorporates various viewpoints and thoughts into the article, and it is indeed quite unusual. I like this article because it is not monotonous. On the contrary, it can greatly inspire my thinking, making me reflect on the beautiful qualities of human beings and filling me, as a human being, with a sense of hope.
The way the author depicts the man in the water is unique for his humane touch of the anonymous hero. He held a standoff in the battle between men and nature. I cannot fully be fond of the article. It is a catastrophe that no one wants to recall. However, the story, along with its symbolic meanings, reminds me of the greatness within human beings.
I like the article and the way this author described it. The author saw the selfless dedication of people from an accident, and from this extended to the reflection on the struggle between nature and man, which inspires people to understand that even if the power of man is small, the contagion of the spirit of selfless dedication is infinite.
I think the author's reporting style is very novel. Unlike other news reports focusing on practicality and the events, he pays more attention to the rising readers' emotional resonance. He uses a lot of rhetorical devices and detailed descriptions. Of course, I like this article. I think it is deeply emotional, and the writing is sincere. Reading it makes me feel like I am right there, and it is very touching.