I believe this is not merely a family quarrel, but also a reflection of thoughts and debates on the issue of racial equality. At first glance, it seems like an ordinary discussion, but in fact, it also reflects the root of the problem of racial discrimination.
No.Because unlike ordinary family quarrels,the quarrel has to do with racial discrimination. The husband and wife's opposing attitudes about whether white people should marry blacks show their differences in values, and they have been married for many years like strangers, never really understanding each other.
I believe this isn't merely an ordinary family dispute. Instead, it mirrors the deep - seated and severe racial conflicts that have long existed in the United States. The US government has, for a long time, stressed political correctness, yet failed to curb the growth of domestic racism. Through this seemingly common family argument, the author satirizes the grave social issue of racial discrimination.
I don't think this is just a ordinary family quarrel. the huaband's answer of "no" shows his prejudice against black people -specifically,his poopsition to interracial marriage. His discrimination isn't openly hostile, but it reveals deeper cultural or racial sterotypes . This isn't just a argument between a couple ; it's about ingrained(根深蒂固的) biases.
No, it is not an ordinary family quarrel. While it starts with a casual disagreement during housework, it quickly reveals deeper issues—like racial prejudice, emotional distance, and a lack of mutual understanding. The argument exposes cracks in their marriage, showing that they may not truly know or accept each other. It’s not just about opinions, but about identity, love, and what it means to really connect.
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
No, it’s not an ordinary family quarrel.The conflict isn’t over trivial issues like chores or schedules. Instead, it cuts to core values: the husband’s explicit racial prejudice and his belief that interracial couples “have no hope of understanding each other.” This reveals a deep moral and ideological divide between him and his wife, Ann. The argument escalates into a test of their relationship’s foundation—whether love can bridge fundamental gaps in empathy and human decency.The story’s irony (husband failing to understand his own wife while judging others) and his namelessness (symbolizing his lack of self-awareness) highlight that this isn’t a typical squabble. It’s a clash over prejudice vs. compassion, exposing how racism can erode intimacy and turn spouses into “strangers,” as seen in the haunting ending.