I believe this is not merely a family quarrel, but also a reflection of thoughts and debates on the issue of racial equality. At first glance, it seems like an ordinary discussion, but in fact, it also reflects the root of the problem of racial discrimination.
教学团队
课程特色
视频(50)
练习(41)
作业(8)
考试(1)
最新学员
问 Unit 2 "Say Yes" is about a family qurrel. Do you think it is an ordinary family quarrel? If not, why?
77 所有答案
-
-
No.Because unlike ordinary family quarrels，the quarrel has to do with racial discrimination. The husband and wife's opposing attitudes about whether white people should marry blacks show their differences in values, and they have been married for many years like strangers, never really understanding each other.
-
I believe this isn't merely an ordinary family dispute. Instead, it mirrors the deep - seated and severe racial conflicts that have long existed in the United States. The US government has, for a long time, stressed political correctness, yet failed to curb the growth of domestic racism. Through this seemingly common family argument, the author satirizes the grave social issue of racial discrimination.
-
I don't think this is just a ordinary family quarrel. the huaband's answer of "no" shows his prejudice against black people -specifically,his poopsition to interracial marriage. His discrimination isn't openly hostile, but it reveals deeper cultural or racial sterotypes . This isn't just a argument between a couple ; it's about ingrained(根深蒂固的) biases.
-
No, it is not an ordinary family quarrel. While it starts with a casual disagreement during housework, it quickly reveals deeper issues—like racial prejudice, emotional distance, and a lack of mutual understanding. The argument exposes cracks in their marriage, showing that they may not truly know or accept each other. It’s not just about opinions, but about identity, love, and what it means to really connect.
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
No, it’s not an ordinary family quarrel.The conflict isn’t over trivial issues like chores or schedules. Instead, it cuts to core values: the husband’s explicit racial prejudice and his belief that interracial couples “have no hope of understanding each other.” This reveals a deep moral and ideological divide between him and his wife, Ann. The argument escalates into a test of their relationship’s foundation—whether love can bridge fundamental gaps in empathy and human decency.The story’s irony (husband failing to understand his own wife while judging others) and his namelessness (symbolizing his lack of self-awareness) highlight that this isn’t a typical squabble. It’s a clash over prejudice vs. compassion, exposing how racism can erode intimacy and turn spouses into “strangers,” as seen in the haunting ending.
-
No,I don't think it is an ordinary family quarrel.This argument seemed to be just a family conflict, but it involved racial issues. The husband was imperceptibly influenced by racism. He thought that was quite normal, the wife and husband did not truly understand each other.Therefore, this is not merely a family conflict, but also a disagreement between a couple on the issue of race.
-
-
I don’t think this is just an ordinary marital conflict. The topic the couple is arguing about is racial discrimination against Black people. The wife asks her husband, "Would you still marry me if I were Black?"she hoping he would say yes. But the husband keeps dodging the question with evasive answers, masking the fact that he harbors racist prejudices. This issue is far too sensitive to be dismissed as a simple domestic dispute; it could even escalate into an ethnic or societal conflict. That’s my opinion.
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
I think this is not just an ordinary family dispute. It more reflects the long-standing serious racial conflicts in the United States. The US government has long emphasized political correctness but has not suppressed the development of domestic racism. The author satirizes the serious social problem of racial discrimination through this seemingly ordinary family argument
-
I don’t think this is just an ordinary marital conflict. The topic the couple is arguing about is racial discrimination against Black people. The wife asks her husband, "Would you still marry me if I were Black?"she hoping he would say yes. But the husband keeps dodging the question with evasive answers, masking the fact that he harbors racist prejudices. This issue is far too sensitive to be dismissed as a simple domestic dispute; it could even escalate into an ethnic or societal conflict. That’s my opinion.
-
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Because unlike ordinary family quarrels，the quarrel has to do with racial discrimination. The husband and wife's opposing attitudes about whether white people should marry blacks show their differences in values, and they have been married for many years like strangers, never really understanding each other.
-
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.The couple quarreled over whether they would marry a black person. The core of the quarrel was racial prejudice and moral choice, touching upon the issue of social equity and transcending the scope of ordinary family conflicts. The husband's transformation from rejection to acceptance revealed the profound impact of prejudice, turning the quarrel into a discussion on human nature and social concepts, and thus having a more profound practical significance.
-
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Usually,the daily ordinary family quarrel is about division of household chores,living habits,communication problem and so on.In the surface,the family quarrel in text seemed like a ordinary quarrel just about racism problem.Actually,its deep meaning is the difference of values between them.Maybe during the 30 years they get married,they have not gotten to know each other turly.
-
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Usually,the daily ordinary family quarrel is about division of household chores,living habits,communication problem and so on.In the surface,the family quarrel in text seemed like a ordinary quarrel just about racism problem.Actually,its deep meaning is the difference of values between them.Maybe during the 30 years they get married,they have not gotten to know each other turly.
-
No, it is not an ordinary family quarrel.1. Depth of the issues involvedIn an ordinary family quarrel, the disputes might be over trivial matters such as who should do the dishes or what to have for dinner. However, in this case, the quarrel seems to be more complex. It may involve fundamental values and principles. For example, it could be about the future of a family member. Maybe a teenager wants to pursue a career in the arts, but the parents insist on a more traditional and stable career path like medicine or law. This kind of disagreement is not just a passing argument but a conflict that can have a long - term impact on the family dynamics and the individual's life.2. Emotional intensityOrdinary family quarrels can usually be resolved with a simple apology or a cooling - off period. But this quarrel appears to be more intense emotionally. The family members might be expressing deep - seated feelings of disappointment, anger, and even betrayal. For instance, if a family member has been keeping a secret that is revealed during the quarrel, such as a hidden relationship or a financial problem, the emotional stakes are much higher than in a typical quarrel. The trust among family members could be severely damaged and it takes a lot more effort to rebuild it.
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Usually,the daily ordinary family quarrel is about division of household chores,living habits,communication problem and so on.In the surface,the family quarrel in text seemed like a ordinary quarrel just about racism problem.Actually,its deep meaning is the difference of values between them.Maybe during the 30 years they get married,they have not gotten to know each other turly
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
"Say Yes" describe a family arguement, but it is not an ordinary one as it delves into deeper issues rather than just surface-level disagreements.The quarrel in the story exposes underlying racial and value differences within the family, making it a more profound exploration of complex relationship dynamics rather than a typical everyday squabble.
-
I agree with the author taht liberal arts education is an important part in college and university education.Lbieral arts can promote students' all-round development and help them form their own thoughts and aesthetics.For example,the co-founder of Apple,Steve Jobs,although he is a tech visionary,he credited his success partly to his exposure to liberal arts.
-
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
-
It is not an ordinary family quarrel. Beyond the surface conflict, it reflects deep - seated issues like racial attitudes and the couple's differing values. The argument about interracial marriage reveals underlying prejudices and the fragility of their relationship, making it a profound exploration of social and personal dilemmas rather than a trivial domestic dispute.
-
添加答案
您确定给 “0” 位老师发送协议吗？
UMOOCS用户服务协议
问题分类：
--
