"Say Yes" is about a family qurrel. Do you think it is an ordinary family quarrel? If not, why?
This is not an ordinary family quarrel. It mainly differs in that, unlike typical ones over daily quarrels, it centers on the profound and sensitive issue of racial attitudes. The husband's stance on interracial marriage reveals deep - seated prejudices, turning it into a confrontation of values with broader social and moral implications, rather than an ordinary family quarrel.
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Usually,the daily ordinary family quarrel is about division of household chores,living habits,communication problem and so on.In the surface,the family quarrel in text seemed like a ordinary quarrel just about racism problem.Actually,its deep meaning is the difference of values between them.Maybe during the 30 years they get married,they have not gotten to know each other turly.
I think this is not just an ordinary family dispute. It more reflects the long-standing serious racial conflicts in the United States. The US government has long emphasized political correctness but has not suppressed the development of domestic racism. The author satirizes the serious social problem of racial discrimination through this seemingly ordinary family argument
I don not think it is an ordinary family quarrel.Because this quarrel involves different racial concepts,it has escalated to a political level of discussion about whether white people and black people should get merried.This reflects the political orientations and marriage views of different people,So this is far from an ordinary family quarrel.
This is not an ordinary quarrel, because their quarrel involves the issue of racial discrimination, as well as the understanding and tolerance between husband and wife. The husband is a racist and a little arrogant. The wife wants her husband to understand her, but the husband has been avoiding the question until the end, the two of them are like strangers at night.
No, it is not an ordinary family quarrel. The fight centers on deeper issues like race and love’s conditions. The husband argues against interracial marriage, claiming cultural differences make it impossible. His wife challenges him by asking if he’d marry her if she were Black. His hesitation and final “no” reveal hidden prejudices, not just a simple disagreement. Their argument exposes personal biases and forces them to question trust and identity, making it more serious than common daily conflicts.
"Say Yes" describe a family arguement, but it is not an ordinary one as it delves into deeper issues rather than just surface-level disagreements.The quarrel in the story exposes underlying racial and value differences within the family, making it a more profound exploration of complex relationship dynamics rather than a typical everyday squabble.
Saying 'yes' depicts a seemingly ordinary marital disagreement that gradually exposes deeper tensions about race, prejudice, and intimacy, far beyond the scope of' ordinary 'arguments. This conflict reveals the fragility of unspoken biases and trust, criticizing how social norms permeate and undermine personal relationships.
No. This family fight seems to be about whether their daughter should marry a black person, but it actually shows their different views on race. Before this argument, the wife always believed they were perfectly matched in mind and soul. This fight broke that illusion. If they can't resolve this deep disagreement, their marriage might fall apart.
I don't think this is just a ordinary family quarrel. the huaband's answer of "no" shows his prejudice against black people -specifically,his poopsition to interracial marriage. His discrimination isn't openly hostile, but it reveals deeper cultural or racial sterotypes . This isn't just a argument between a couple ; it's about ingrained(根深蒂固的) biases.
No,I don't think it is an ordinary family quarrel.This argument seemed to be just a family conflict, but it involved racial issues. The husband was imperceptibly influenced by racism. He thought that was quite normal, the wife and husband did not truly understand each other.Therefore, this is not merely a family conflict, but also a disagreement between a couple on the issue of race.
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Because unlike ordinary family quarrels,the quarrel has to do with racial discrimination. The husband and wife's opposing attitudes about whether white people should marry blacks show their differences in values, and they have been married for many years like strangers, never really understanding each other.
No, this is not an ordinary family quarrel. Most couples argue about small things in the life, but this quarrel is more serious. The husband’s words show he wouldn’t marry his wife if she were Black. This hurts her because it means his love is not pure. The story has an open end, showing their marriage may come to the destination. It’s not just a simple argument,it’s about race, love, and their different prejudices.
I don't think this is an ordinary quarrel. It's a matter of different values. The couple may seem to be bickering on the surface, but in essence, it's about racial discrimination.
No, it is not an ordinary family quarrel. The fight centers on deeper issues like race and love’s conditions. The husband argues against interracial marriage, claiming cultural differences make it impossible. His wife challenges him by asking if he’d marry her if she were Black. His hesitation and final “no” reveal hidden prejudices, not just a simple disagreement. Their argument exposes personal biases and forces them to question trust and identity, making it more serious than common daily conflicts.
Involving sensitive racial issues: The quarrel doesn't stem from trivial daily matters like typical family spats over chores or finances. Instead, it centers on the sensitive and profound topic of whether white people should marry black people. This touches on deep - seated social and cultural issues such as racial equality and cultural differences.
Revealing ideological conflicts: It exposes the ideological divergence between the couple. The husband holds the view that people from different cultural backgrounds, such as white and black people, are difficult to truly understand each other, which reflects a certain degree of racial prejudice to some extent. While the wife advocates equality in interracial marriage, believing that love can transcend racial and cultural differences. This fundamental conflict in values makes this quarrel more complex and significant than an ordinary family quarrel.
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Usually,the daily ordinary family quarrel is about division of household chores,living habits,communication problem and so on.In the surface,the family quarrel in text seemed like a ordinary quarrel just about racism problem.Actually,its deep meaning is the difference of values between them.Maybe during the 30 years they get married,they have not gotten to know each other turly.
I don not think it is an ordinary family quarrel.Because this quarrel involves different racial concepts,it has escalated to a political level of discussion about whether white people and black people should get merried.This reflects the political orientations and marriage views of different people,So this is far from an ordinary family quarrel.
I don’t think this is just an ordinary marital conflict. The topic the couple is arguing about is racial discrimination against Black people. The wife asks her husband, "Would you still marry me if I were Black?"she hoping he would say yes. But the husband keeps dodging the question with evasive answers, masking the fact that he harbors racist prejudices. This issue is far too sensitive to be dismissed as a simple domestic dispute; it could even escalate into an ethnic or societal conflict. That’s my opinion.
I think it is not a ordinary family quarrel.Usually,the daily ordinary family quarrel is about division of household chores,living habits,communication problem and so on.In the surface,the family quarrel in text seemed like a ordinary quarrel just about racism problem.Actually,its deep meaning is the difference of values between them.Maybe during the 30 years they get married,they have not gotten to know each other turly.
I don't think it's an ordinary family quarrel. In “Say Yes”, the quarrel isn't just about trivial daily matters. It touches on deeper - seated issues like racial prejudice. The couple's discussion about housing in a certain neighborhood reveals their subconscious biases and the complex social and moral questions underlying their relationship.
No, it is not an ordinary family quarrel. The fight centers on deeper issues like race and love’s conditions. The husband argues against interracial marriage, claiming cultural differences make it impossible. His wife challenges him by asking if he’d marry her if she were Black. His hesitation and final “no” reveal hidden prejudices, not just a simple disagreement. Their argument exposes personal biases and forces them to question trust and identity, making it more serious than common daily conflicts.
I don't think it's an ordinary family quarrel. In a typical family quarrel, the topics usually revolve around daily琐事 like household chores, money, or small misunderstandings. However, in "Say Yes", the quarrel delves into deeper - seated issues such as racial prejudice and personal values.
In "Say Yes," the family quarrel isn’t ordinary because it reveals deep - seated prejudices masked as a trivial debate.
The conflict starts when the couple argues over whether they’d marry someone of a different race. What seems like a hypothetical question quickly turns tense: the husband insists “race doesn’t matter,” but his wife pushes back, pointing out his discomfort with the idea. Their fight isn’t about a daily hassle (like chores or money) but about unspoken biases. For example, the husband’s defensive reaction—“What makes you think I’d care?”—hides his real prejudice, which surfaces when he admits he “might” hesitate. The story uses the quarrel to expose how societal racism seeps into personal relationships, turning a “hypothetical” into a mirror of their true beliefs.
Unlike ordinary family fights, this conflict isn’t resolved. Instead, it ends with the wife silently sewing a button, symbolizing the tension that lingers—highlighting how prejudice can fracture trust even in loving relationships. The quarrel is extraordinary because it’s a microcosm of larger societal issues, making a “small” argument carry profound weight.