"Li" is deeply rooted in Chinese cultural traditions and social norms, whereas
Kant's concept of freedom is a philosophical construct derived from
Western moral philosophy."Li" often involves adhering to external social norms and expectations, whereas.Kant's freedom emphasizes internal self-legislation and the autonomy of the will."Li" tends to emphasize collective harmony and social order, whereas Kant's freedom focuses on the individual's moral autonomy and the ability to set one's own moral course. Despite these differences, both "Li" and Kant's freedom serve important functions in their respective contexts. "Li" helps maintain social harmony and order in Chinese society, while Kant's freedom provides a philosophical foundation for individual moral autonomy and ethical behavior.
教学团队
课程特色
视频(28)
考试(25)
文档(3)
讨论(3)
最新学员
A discussion on Li with a comparitive view of Kant's interpretation of "freedom"
Some people believe Li or rituals are about organizing and structuring social and personal behaviors, and thus seem to conflict with human emotional instinct and free spirit. Then, can we draw the conclusion that Confucius is in line with inhumanity (as suggested by Bertrand Russel on page 54)? Bear this question in your mind and answer the following questions:
–a) What indeed is freedom? Use Kant’s interpretation of freedom as a way to comprehend your understanding of Confucius’s requisites on propriety. In what way are Confucius’s idea of propriety comparable with Kant’s idea of imperative duty?
–b) How does the German philosopher Kant define human’s “rational capacity”? From this perspective, how should we look at Confucian's influence on Chinese humanity? How is western rationality similar and different from Confucian rationality?
341 回复
-
-
Professor Fei Xiaotong's concept of "differentiated love" does not necessarily imply that Confucians advocate a hierarchical or thinning out of love as it extends beyond one's immediate family. Rather, it highlights the recognition of different degrees of intimacy and responsibility in relationships. In Confucianism, the extension of love is rooted in the principle of "ren" (benevolence), which encourages individuals to cultivate a sense of universal care and concern for others.
While there is an emphasis on filial piety and loyalty to one's family, this does not exclude the expansion of love and compassion towards others. Confucianism teaches that through the cultivation of one's own virtue and the practice of ethical behavior, one can gradually extend one's circle of care to encompass neighbors, community members, and even all humanity. This extension of love is seen as a natural progression, rooted in the individual's inner cultivation and ethical development.
-
Yes, Fei Xiaotong's concept of "differentiated love" suggests that Confucianism prioritizes stronger love for one's family, gradually extending to others. In Confucianism, love begins with close family members and extends outward to society. The love for family is considered primary, based on filial piety, while love for others, such as friends or strangers, becomes more abstract and less intense. This reflects the Confucian idea of nurturing social harmony, starting from the family and expanding through moral cultivation and reciprocity.
-
Fei Xiaotong's "differential love" is based on the theory of "differential pattern of social relations" in Chinese rural society. He believes that in a society with a differential pattern, love is hierarchical.
Confucianism advocates "benevolent love," which is not confined to the family but can be extended to society, the state, and even the universe. However, Confucianism also emphasizes family ethics and highlights filial piety and fraternal love as virtues within the family.
This does not mean that Confucianism advocates a stronger love for one's own family than for others; rather, in Confucianism, the family is seen as the basic unit of society, and love for the family is the manifestation of benevolent love within the family sphere.
The extension of love refers to the expansion of love from individuals and families to broader social levels.
In Confucian thought, benevolent love is not limited to filial piety and fraternal love within the family but is a universal love that can be extended to others and all things.
In summary, Fei Xiaotong's "differential love" and Confucianism are not contradictory but rather elucidate the connotation and extension of love from different perspectives. Confucianism emphasizes the universality and extensibility of benevolent love, while the extension of love refers to the continuous expansion of this love to broader social levels.
-
a) Freedom, in Kant's view, is the ability to act according to universal moral laws, not just personal desires. Confucius's propriety aligns with this by advocating for actions that align with social harmony and moral virtues, akin to Kant's categorical imperative.
b) Kant defines rational capacity as the ability to reason and act according to universal principles. Confucianism's influence on Chinese humanity is seen in its emphasis on moral development and social roles, which parallels Western rationality in seeking order but differs in its focus on collective harmony over individual rights.
-
a) Understanding of Freedom and Comparison with Confucius' Propriety
1. Kant's Interpretation of Freedom
- For Kant, freedom is the ability to act in accordance with the moral law that one gives to oneself. It is not simply doing whatever one desires (which Kant would consider as acting on inclinations), but rather acting in a way that is consistent with universal moral principles.
- Kant's concept of freedom is closely related to his idea of the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a moral principle that commands actions as necessary without reference to any other end. For example, one formulation of the categorical imperative is to “act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.”
2. Confucius' Requisites on Propriety
- Confucius' idea of propriety (Li) is about proper behavior in various social relationships. It is not a set of rigid rules that suppress human nature but rather a way to cultivate harmonious and ethical social interactions.
- In a way, Confucius' propriety can be compared to Kant's idea of imperative duty. Just as Kant believes that one should act according to moral laws, Confucius believes that people should follow the norms of propriety. For example, in Confucian ethics, filial piety is an important part of propriety. It is not just an emotional bond but also a moral obligation. This is similar to Kant's idea that we have moral duties that we should fulfill regardless of our immediate desires. However, while Kant's moral law is based on pure reason and the concept of universality, Confucius' propriety is more deeply rooted in the context of traditional Chinese society and its hierarchical and family - centered relationships.
b) Kant's Definition of Rational Capacity and Comparison with Confucian Rationality**
1. Kant's Definition of Human's “Rational Capacity”
- Kant believes that human beings have a rational capacity that allows them to distinguish right from wrong, to understand moral laws, and to act in accordance with these laws. This rational capacity is what makes humans moral agents. It enables humans to rise above their animal instincts and act in a way that is consistent with universal moral principles.
2. Confucian Influence on Chinese Humanity
- Confucianism has had a profound influence on Chinese humanity. It has emphasized moral cultivation, social harmony, and respect for traditional values. Confucian rationality is centered around the idea of the “mean” (zhongyong), which is about finding the appropriate balance in various aspects of life. For example, in dealing with emotions, Confucianism encourages people to regulate their emotions in a proper way rather than being completely dominated by them.
- Confucian rationality also focuses on the importance of social relationships. People are expected to act in a way that is beneficial to the family and society as a whole. This is different from Kant's rationality which is more focused on the individual's moral autonomy based on pure reason.
**3. Similarities and Differences between Western Rationality (Kant's) and Confucian Rationality**
- Similarities*:
- Both Kantian and Confucian rationality recognize the importance of moral principles. They both believe that humans should act in a way that is considered morally right.
- They also both emphasize the role of self - reflection. In Kant's philosophy, one has to reflect on whether one's actions can be made into a universal law. In Confucianism, self - cultivation through self - reflection is an important part of moral development.
- Differences:
- As mentioned before, Kant's rationality is more individual - centered in terms of moral autonomy, while Confucian rationality is more social - centered, focusing on the harmony of family and society.
- The basis of their moral principles is different. Kant's moral principles are derived from pure reason and the concept of universality, while Confucian moral principles are deeply influenced by traditional Chinese values and social structures.
In conclusion, it is completely wrong to say that Confucius is inhumane. Confucius' ideas, including propriety, are an important part of Chinese ethical and philosophical heritage, and they have their own unique value in promoting human moral development and social harmony.
-
For Kant, freedom is not simply the absence of external constraints or the ability to act according to one's desires without any hindrance. Instead, he posits that true freedom lies in acting in accordance with the moral law that one gives to oneself through reason.
it is completely wrong to claim that Confucius is in line with inhumanity. Both Kant's philosophy and Confucianism have their own valuable insights into human nature, rationality, and moral conduct, and they contribute to our understanding of how humans can live a good life and build a harmonious society in different but equally significant ways.
-
While there may be tensions between structure (as seen in Confucian propriety) and individual freedom (as emphasized by Kant), both perspectives ultimately seek to guide individuals toward ethical living—each through its own lens of understanding human nature and society. Rather than being inherently inhumane or stifling individuality, Confucianism offers a framework for nurturing humanity within the context of social relationships.
-
- Freedom for Kant is acting according to moral laws given by reason. Confucius's propriety isn't a constraint on freedom. It's a way to achieve harmonious social and personal life. Propriety and Kant's imperative duty both aim to guide moral behavior.
- Kant defines “rational capacity” as the ability to understand and follow moral principles. Confucianism influenced Chinese humanity by emphasizing moral self - cultivation. Western rationality focuses on objective knowledge and problem - solving, while Confucian rationality centers on moral and social relations. They both value reason, but have different focuses. And Confucius isn't inhumane; his ideas promote social harmony and personal growth
-
To engage with your questions, we can explore the concepts of freedom, propriety, and rationality as understood by Confucius and Kant, and examine their implications for humanity.
What indeed is freedom?
Kant defines freedom primarily in terms of autonomy and rational will. For him, true freedom is not merely the absence of constraints but the ability to act according to one's rational will, guided by moral law. This aligns with his concept of the "categorical imperative," which posits that moral actions must be universally applicable and respect the inherent dignity of all rational beings.
Confucius's idea of propriety (Li) emphasizes the importance of social roles, rituals, and moral conduct in maintaining harmony within society. While this may seem to conflict with individual emotional instincts and free spirit, it can also be interpreted as a framework that enables individuals to express their freedom within a structured social context. In this way, Confucius's propriety can be seen as a form of duty that contributes to the greater good, akin to Kant’s imperative duty.
Both thinkers value the role of duty in achieving a moral life. For Confucius, adhering to propriety cultivates virtues such as respect, loyalty, and righteousness, which are essential for harmonious living. Similarly, Kant’s notion of moral duty requires individuals to act according to principles that can be universally applied. Thus, while Confucius emphasizes social harmony through structured behavior, Kant focuses on individual moral autonomy; both perspectives ultimately seek to promote ethical living.
How does Kant define human's "rational capacity"?
Kant defines human rational capacity as the ability to think critically, make decisions based on reason rather than impulse, and recognize moral imperatives. He believes that rationality is what distinguishes humans from other beings and allows them to legislate moral laws for themselves. This rational capacity is central to his philosophy, as it underpins the idea of autonomy and the necessity of acting according to reasoned principles.
When considering Confucian influence on Chinese humanity from this perspective, we can see that Confucianism also values rationality but places a stronger emphasis on relational ethics and social harmony. Confucian rationality involves understanding one's role within the family and society and acting accordingly. It promotes virtues that foster social cohesion, suggesting that rationality is not solely an individual endeavor but also a collective one.
In comparing Western rationality with Confucian rationality, we find both similarities and differences. Both traditions value reason and ethical behavior; however, Western rationality often prioritizes individual autonomy and rights, while Confucian rationality emphasizes relational duties and communal responsibilities. This leads to different understandings of freedom: in the West, it tends to focus on individual liberty, whereas in Confucian thought, it is more about fulfilling one’s role within a community.
While some may argue that Confucius's emphasis on propriety conflicts with human emotion and free spirit, it can also be viewed as a means of structuring freedom within a social context. The interplay between Confucian and Kantian ideas reveals rich insights into the nature of morality, duty, and human relationships across cultures.
-
a：Freedom, according to Kant, is the autonomy to act in accordance with one's own rational principles, free from external coercion. In the context of Confucius's thought, propriety (li) serves as a framework for social and personal behavior, aiming to harmonize relationships and ensure social order. While Kant's imperative duty emphasizes the universalizability of moral principles, Confucius's propriety also reflects a sense of universal applicability, albeit rooted in cultural tradition. Both advocate for a code of conduct that transcends personal desires and promotes societal well-being. However, Kant's focus is on rational autonomy, whereas Confucius emphasizes the importance of social harmony and respect for tradition. b：Kant defines human rationality as the ability to reason and form judgments based on universally valid principles. In contrast, Confucian rationality emphasizes the cultivation of inner virtue and the harmonious application of social norms. Both systems value rational thought and self-improvement, but they differ in their approach. Western rationality tends to focus on individual autonomy and the pursuit of knowledge, whereas Confucian rationality emphasizes social harmony and respect for tradition. Despite these differences, both systems have contributed to the development of human thought and culture, showcasing the diversity of rational approaches across cultures.
-
Fei Xiaotong's concept of "differential benevolence," rooted in Confucian ethics, posits that affection and duty extend outwards from the self, strongest within the family and decreasing with distance. Yet, it advocates a hierarchical yet expansive view of love, beginning intimately and widening to include broader society. Central to Confucianism is *ren*—benevolence—that starts with family love and ideally expands to encompass all humanity, acknowledging relational differences while promoting a sense of justice and propriety. Confucian teachings emphasize broadening one's sphere of moral concern, balancing personal and communal interests, encouraging the cultivation of virtue and the extension of kindness universally, fostering a harmonious society that respects familial loyalty alongside global citizenship.
-
Kant's concept of freedom emphasizes the self-discipline of reason, that is, human behavior should be constrained by the moral laws established by reason. Confucius' "ritual" is an external code of conduct that requires people to follow certain rituals and etiquette, which also reflects the constraints on human behavior. In this sense, Kant's rational self-discipline and Confucius' constraint of "ritual" have similarities, both emphasizing that human behavior should be constrained by certain rules. Kant believed that true freedom is the autonomy of moral will, which requires people to be responsible for their actions. Confucius' "ritual" emphasizes the cultivation of one's own moral character through learning and practicing "ritual", achieving personal self-cultivation and moral perfection. In this sense, Kant's moral responsibility and Confucius' practice of "ritual" both reflect the emphasis and pursuit of moral behavior.
添加回复
您确定给 “0” 位老师发送协议吗？
UMOOCS用户服务协议
问题分类：
--
4008987008